I just got to share some of the comments I get!
- 2010, by far the best one, on this paper (when it was reviewed for Biology Letters)
“Based on the poor research methodology and speculative nature of this manuscript -especially at a time when the “climate change” community is under scrutiny (and rightly so) this manuscript would not enhance the science of climate change and therefore is without merit.”
Luckily for me, I also get positive feedback:
- Also 2010, by far the most flattering comments, on this paper:
“This is a really elegant experiment that clearly illustrates the role that variability could potentially play in allowing malaria to persist at the edge of it’s climate range” and “The paper is well-written and the experiments elegant“